I rarely read the same kind of book twice in a row.
The purchase links below are Amazon affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
After finishing the original Red Rising trilogy, which I absolutely loved, I moved directly to Stoner by John Williams. That’s about as dramatic a change of pace as a reader can make. I went from a violent, propulsive science-fiction rebellion to a quiet novel about the disappointments, compromises and small victories of an ordinary academic life.
Red Rising by Pierce Brown
Buy on Amazon →Stoner by John Williams
Buy on Amazon →
After Stoner, I switched back to fantasy with The Sword of Kaigen. That one was only moderately successful for me. I could appreciate what it was doing, but it never connected with me in the same way. Now I’m reading Mistborn, and when I finish the series, I’ll probably try East of Eden.
This isn’t a formal reading system. I didn’t create a spreadsheet or decide that every thousand pages of fantasy must be followed by an approved literary classic. It’s simply a rhythm I’ve gradually developed.
I like moving between popular fiction and literary fiction because each asks something different of me.
Changing the kind of attention I use
A series such as Red Rising or Mistborn creates momentum. It gives me a world to enter, characters to follow and problems I want to see resolved. The pleasure comes partly from forward motion. What happens next? How will the characters escape? Which alliance will collapse? How can the established rules be used in an unexpected way?
That doesn’t mean popular fiction lacks depth. It absolutely can have political, psychological and philosophical substance. Mistborn has complicated ideas about power, revolution and what happens after a supposedly decisive victory. Red Rising explores hierarchy, loyalty, identity and the compromises people make while trying to change a system.
Popular fiction can carry serious ideas while still making you desperate to turn the page.
Literary fiction often changes the direction of my attention. Instead of constantly pulling me toward the next event, it makes me spend more time thinking about the current moment. I notice the language, what a character is refusing to say, and the significance of choices that might appear uneventful from the outside.
That was my experience moving from Red Rising to Stoner. The latter doesn’t rely on battles, elaborate world-building or cliffhangers. Its power comes from observation and accumulation. It asks you to look closely at one life and consider how much can be contained within something that might appear ordinary.
It’s not necessarily better or more intelligent. It simply uses a different set of reading muscles.
It is not a hierarchy
Describing this habit can easily sound pretentious. Saying that I need “intellectual stimulation” after popular fiction might imply that fantasy and science fiction are intellectually empty. I don’t believe that at all.
Some popular fiction contains more interesting ideas than many books classified as literary. Some literary novels are beautifully written but leave me cold. A label doesn’t determine whether a book has depth, just as popularity doesn’t make a book shallow.
The difference for me is in the kind of mental effort involved.
A fast-moving fantasy series asks me to absorb a world, understand its rules, track its factions and imagine possibilities beyond ordinary life. A literary novel may ask me to slow down, study language and sit with ambiguity rather than waiting for a mystery to be resolved.
That change keeps reading fresh.
The switch prevents reading fatigue
Even when I love a series, I can eventually become saturated by its world.
Long fantasy and science-fiction series require commitment. You spend hundreds or thousands of pages with the same characters, conflicts and systems. That immersion is one of their greatest pleasures, but it can also make the next similar book feel less distinctive.
Moving to something completely different resets my attention.
After spending weeks with Sanderson, I may want Steinbeck or Hemingway. After living inside a quiet literary novel, I may be ready to return to Pierce Brown and watch everything explode again. The contrast makes both experiences more enjoyable.
This doesn’t guarantee that I’ll love the next book. The Sword of Kaigen didn’t work for me as well as I had hoped. Changing genres can’t manufacture a connection that’s not there. What the habit does is prevent me from rejecting a potentially good book simply because I’ve exhausted my appetite for that particular style.
Sometimes the wrong book is really the wrong book. Other times, it’s simply the wrong book for that moment.
I usually keep a nonfiction book going too
Alongside this alternating fiction pattern, I normally read one nonfiction book at the same time.
Right now, while reading Mistborn, I’m also reading Mark Carney's Value(s). The two books occupy separate spaces in my mind. One provides the immersion and momentum of a fictional world. The other gives me an argument, real-world ideas and something I can consider in smaller sections.
Nonfiction also fits differently into my schedule. I might want a chapter that explains economics, history, psychology or cosmology without committing myself to another hour inside a fictional story. At another moment, the last thing I want is an argument about public policy, and I’d much rather return to Allomancy.
This means my reading life might involve moving from Sanderson to Steinbeck, then back to Pierce Brown, with some Brian Greene cosmology running quietly in the background.
That may sound chaotic, but it works for me.
Reading mood matters more than genre loyalty
Readers are often described by genre. Someone is a fantasy reader, a science-fiction reader, a history reader or a lover of the classics.
Those descriptions can be useful, but they’re incomplete. I love fantasy, yet that doesn’t mean I always want another fantasy novel when I finish one. Sometimes the quality I want next is contrast.
I may want less plot and more reflection. I may want to leave an invented world and think about a real one. I may want beautiful, restrained prose after a massive action sequence. Eventually, I’ll want the action again.
My favourite books don’t all sit on the same shelf, and they don’t all require the same kind of attention. What connects them is that they arrived when I was ready for what they offered.
That’s why choosing the next book should involve more than identifying your favourite genre. It should also account for what you’ve just finished, how it affected you and what kind of reading experience you want now.
Books mentioned
This article contains Amazon affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Want to pick better books?
Tell us what you love, what you dislike and what kind of reading experience you are ready for. Your next book does not need to resemble your last one. Sometimes it should be the complete opposite.
Find my next book